Constroma vs SmartPM
Both Constroma and SmartPM help construction teams analyze P6 schedules. The key difference is focus: SmartPM specializes in schedule analytics and health monitoring, while Constroma specializes in forensic delay analysis, claims management, and AACE-compliant analysis methodologies.
| Feature | Constroma | SmartPM |
|---|---|---|
| Time Impact Analysis (TIA) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Windows Analysis (MIP 3.7) | ✓ | ✗ |
| P6 XER Import | ✓ | ✓ |
| CPM Calculation Engine | ✓ | ✓ |
| Critical Path Tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fragnet Builder | ✓ | ✗ |
| Claims Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| EOT Claim Preparation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Schedule Health Analytics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gantt Chart Visualization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-Project Portfolio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| AACE RP 29 Compliant | ✓ | ✗ |
| XER Export (P6 Compatible) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Earned Value Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Risk Register | ✓ | ✗ |
When to Choose Constroma
Choose Constroma when you need to perform forensic delay analysis for claims and disputes. Constroma automates Time Impact Analysis (TIA) and Windows Analysis (MIP 3.7), includes a full claims management workflow, and produces AACE RP 29R-03 compliant analysis results. If your primary need is preparing extension of time claims, defending against liquidated damages, or performing schedule forensics for arbitration, Constroma is built for that purpose.
When to Choose SmartPM
Choose SmartPM when your primary focus is ongoing schedule health monitoring and analytics. SmartPM provides schedule comparison dashboards, compression analysis, and automated health scoring that helps project teams identify scheduling issues proactively.